Conservation vs. Preservation

Preservation is the "practice of protecting ecosystems, species, and natural resources from degradation and destruction," (National Geographic). Preservation is the idea of nature left untouched and maintaining natural resources within a pristine state. Preservation protects land and ecosystems from human alteration. A common belief within preservation is that human impact is harmful and should be avoided entirely. Some examples of this are strict wilderness zones and no-go zones. 

​

Conservation is the "care and protection of Earth's natural resources for current and future generations," (National Geographic). This idea of responsible use of nature focuses on sustainable management of natural resources and allowing for regulated human use to ensure long-term availability for future generations. This includes the restoration of ecosystems and sustainable practices. Conservation as a whole recognizes that humans are also a part of ecosystems throughout the world and should take care of them. Examples of this would be game reserves and national parks, which highlight the protection of ecosystems through sustainable human management.

​

Conservation tends to be more practical and inclusive while preservation is critical. Both approaches are valid and can be true at the same time. However, both viewpoints are needed. Some areas need this full protection while others benefit from sustainable use and management. Protecting nature requires flexibility, not extremes. 

​

Overall, balance is key. It is important to preserve what must remain untouched and conserve what can be responsibly used. Humans must learn to properly coexist with nature and live sustainable lifestyles to protect resources for future generations and ecosystem health. Protecting our planet is not about choosing one viewpoint, it's using both wisely.